On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 06:17:46 -0400
Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Looking for a MRTG user or two to test out this update..

No one on the list uses MRTG with SNMP?

> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/p5-SNMP_Session/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.9
> diff -u -p -r1.9 Makefile
> --- Makefile  1 Jul 2008 16:41:19 -0000       1.9
> +++ Makefile  14 Aug 2008 03:58:39 -0000
> @@ -3,14 +3,15 @@
>  COMMENT=     provides rudimentary access to remote SNMP agents
>  
>  MODULES=     cpan
> -DISTNAME=    SNMP_Session-1.07
> -PKGNAME=     p5-${DISTNAME}p1
> +DISTNAME=    SNMP_Session-1.12
> +PKGNAME=     p5-${DISTNAME}
>  CATEGORIES=  net
>  
>  HOMEPAGE=    http://www.switch.ch/misc/leinen/snmp/perl/
> -MASTER_SITES=        ${HOMEPAGE}dist/old/
> +MASTER_SITES=        ${HOMEPAGE}dist/ \
> +             ${HOMEPAGE}dist/old/
>  
> -# Artistic License
> +# Artistic License 2.0
>  PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM=   Yes
>  PERMIT_PACKAGE_FTP=     Yes
>  PERMIT_DISTFILES_CDROM= Yes
> Index: distinfo
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/p5-SNMP_Session/distinfo,v
> retrieving revision 1.6
> diff -u -p -r1.6 distinfo
> --- distinfo  5 Apr 2007 16:20:14 -0000       1.6
> +++ distinfo  14 Aug 2008 03:58:44 -0000
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> -MD5 (SNMP_Session-1.07.tar.gz) = SWcl4lTJjPGGNwPEGE94Pg==
> -RMD160 (SNMP_Session-1.07.tar.gz) = xDX7hV8yzpg4iXLGg6zP8Pwb2NA=
> -SHA1 (SNMP_Session-1.07.tar.gz) = mMFput5y1MJp8vc+WP0Kz4EnOds=
> -SHA256 (SNMP_Session-1.07.tar.gz) = 
> KT0VM00iXCIzGT7XtY2czcS+xO2weFN82+vxeMNUt0E=
> -SIZE (SNMP_Session-1.07.tar.gz) = 66588
> +MD5 (SNMP_Session-1.12.tar.gz) = X2s2W0w4FbE9epAtlOJUrw==
> +RMD160 (SNMP_Session-1.12.tar.gz) = sZeI6QTcXVzlrfojkr50OlZwDe8=
> +SHA1 (SNMP_Session-1.12.tar.gz) = ud9qBvrsdBm1I6HDbXk2d1F1yUw=
> +SHA256 (SNMP_Session-1.12.tar.gz) = 
> lXBTaDyjYSlWXbUBjdIZvMdArngcT7ybwD8mP2kXMOg=
> +SIZE (SNMP_Session-1.12.tar.gz) = 68407
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Reply via email to