* b...@openbsd.rutgers.edu <b...@openbsd.rutgers.edu> [090216 21:45]: > On 17 February 2009 at 1:31, Marius ROMAN <marius.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Jim Razmus <j...@bonetruck.org> wrote: > > > Couldn't sleep... > > > > > > Varnish 2.0.3 - high-performance HTTP accelerator > > > > > > I've rolled this up to the latest release. Builds on i386 -current and > > > tested on sparc64 -current. I might take maintainer after all depending > > > on my employer using it. Should have an answer in the next few business > > > days. > > > > > > I would appreciate someone taking a look at the varnishd.1 man page patch > > > and see if that can be improved to something that can go upstream. > > > Frankly I don't have any skill wielding that syntax. > > > > > > port available here: http://www.bonetruck.org/tmp/varnish-2.0.3.tgz > > > > > > Test reports welcome, preferably on -current. I'd like to know the > > > tested platform too. > > > > Builds, installs and runs. > > Tested on i386 -current > > > > Spotted a problem with varnishd man page : > > > > man varnishd -> q > > > > [r...@foo varnish] man varnishd > > man: Formatting manual page... > > Usage: Too many arguments (maximum of 8 accepted) (#269) > > Cm malloc Ns Op Ns , Ns Ar size > > Jim, I fixed this in my port. Feel free to take back anything useful. > > http://openbsd.rutgers.edu/varnish.tar >
Again I throw varnish maintainer up in the air. My employer has decided to go with Apache2 mod_cache. I don't have a personal need for varnish either. Anyone want it? Jim
