Hi! On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 03:36:43AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: >On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 09:58:30PM +0200, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 08:09:25AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: >> >[...] >> >Kde 4 is not linked to the builds for a reason : it needs some time to >> >be updated and fixed. >> And I'm glad that kde3 is still available on OpenBSD. Co-workers are >> having a bad experience with the kde4 (which is there w/o choice on >> Debian, at least unstable). >I didn't imply Kde4 itself had to be fixed :) I didn't mean to say *you* said something to that amount. *I* said that myself, based on the experience of co-workers (and some by seeing it myself when sitting alongside with them at their desks). E.g. (re)painting errors in kde4's konqueror (dunno whether it's a bug of konqueror proper, of khtml [or its successor] or qt4 [but kate doesn't seem to have similar bugs, according to the co-worker who has those experiences). If you experience them, part of the web page is not seen, you see the screen background instead. And it seems to be a slower experience in general, compared to kde3. As long as that is not resolved (upstream, I guess), I'd be happy to have a choice to stay with kde3 instead of upgrading. >I've had some quite good >test reports of 4.2 on various systems, it seems pretty much usable >there. But on OpenBSD, there is still a lot of work to update the >existing port, and fix all the little runtime bugs noone sees when they >don't really _use_ the software. If someone steps up to do this work, >he'll be welcomed. (He has to update cmake first :) cmake :( Another thing I just couldn't stop griping about once I start. >Landry Kind regards, Hannah.
