On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Landry Breuil <lan...@rhaalovely.net> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 01:26:54PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 11:51:40AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: >> > On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:54:02PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > here's a preliminary diff to update wxWidgets to 2.8.10 version. >> > > some shared_libs were bumped (major, minor) according to careful nm >> > > output checking, but i might have missed some - i'm tempted to bump all >> > > majors to be on the safe side. >> > > not that i didn't test (yet) ports depending on it(such as bindings and >> > > complementary libs), but if you use wx ports, try this. updating this >> > > was a real pain. I had to add a lot of things in patches to avoid evil >> > > ln -s between .so.0, .so.version, and .so - this was not needed before, >> > > and i'd like to understand why... >> > > >> > > btw, if you run bulk builds, drop this in. >> > >> > New diff, a bit simpler, patches/patch-autoconf_inc_m4 takes care of >> > unforcing the evil ln -s use, instead of adding loads of chunks to >> > others Makefile.in patches. >> >> And for the record, filezilla, pgadmin3, spe (and thus py-wxPython) are >> happy with this update, still build and run fine @i386/amd64. > > And it showed no fallouts in two bulk builds. > So now, who's ok with this diff ? I think to be on the safe side, i'll > bump each major shlib. > > Landry > >
Hi, are the i18n-catalogs still included? greets Stefan -- Grüße Stefan Rinkes
