On Saturday 19 September 2009 10:50:02 Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've been willing (with agreement from some other porters) to merge some
> gstreamer-plugins-* subpackages into their -main counterpart.
> This for several reasons.
>
> For the most used plugins, like jpeg, vorbis, ogg, png... I don't really
> see any point in having a subpackage for each as their dependency is
> quite small and are already probably installed on desktop systems using
> gstreamer plugins.
> Also, this will greatly simplify maintainance and upgrade.
> But the most important thing imho, it that basic functionnality shoud be
> there when you install a gstreamer-plugins package, we've seen several
> reports on ports@ already about either missing dependencies or missing
> functionnality from packages because the user was missing one of the
> "obvious" plugins (like he already had gstreamer-plugins-base but was
> missing gstreamer-plugins-vorbis which imho should have been part of
> gstreamer-plugins-base in the first place).
>
> Here's a primilarely diff that only does the merging so that you guys
> can check what would go into -main and what would stay as a subpackage.
> Don't look to deep at the diff, I only made sure it would build but
> that's all. I didn't want to put too much work on this if the general
> consensus was against it.
>
> If most people are ok with this change, then I will cook up a complete
> diff with necessary modifications to ports depending on
> gstreamer-plugins-*.

If you're going to merge all of these then it only makes sense to also
merge speex for plugins-good.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Reply via email to