On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Alexander Bubnov wrote: > Yes. Like that - BSD community. I do not think it is Utopia. I think at > first there is a need to discussed some general aims and rules which helps > to resolve difference opinions. Then do common work together. > For example (below just alphabetically sort BSD systems), > - FreeBSD would like to be fastest under i386. FreeBSD team can do > packages/ports related to i386. > - NetBSD would like to be ported under many platforms. This BSD can do all > rest work. > - OpenBSD would like to be very secure and stable. Blowfish team can > implement packages system to build them for N-platform using pkgsrc. > > I guess cooperation of BSD teams can save time to concentrate for different > aims, but not common. > BSD community is the power . > Unfortunately, I can see divisions like DragonflyBSD. I guess it is bad way. > It is just my opinion.
Do you know this quote? "In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is." -- Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut You shouldn't believe when you read about: OpenBSD -> secure NetBSD -> portable FreeBSD -> fast Make people think these qualities are mutually exclusive and in consequence make assumptions like you made. Teers, -- Daniel Bolgheroni FEI - Faculdade de Engenharia Industrial http://www.dbolgheroni.eng.br/mykey ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) against HTML e-mail X / \
