On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 06:57:11AM -0600, David Taveras wrote: > Hello > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Landry Breuil <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 07:01:19PM -0500, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 05:53:05PM -0600, David Taveras wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > If it has been commited.. to stable I suppose. Why doesnt it show in > >> > the errata.html for 4.5/4.6 ? > >> > >> Dunno. > > > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=125846854017056&w=2 > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=125846857417100&w=2 > > > > errata.html was not updated. > > > > Could anybody tell me why errata was not updated?
Stuart updated it some minutes ago. Your best option would be to follow cvs commits, and look for commits to -stable branches, if the information provided on the website (which is manually updated, by developers, who are working on their spare time, etc) is not enough for you. > >> > Would this also apply for apache2 that I assume uses the OpenSSL from > >> > ports? > >> > >> The patch was for openssl in base so I'm not sure about that. > > > > There is not such thing as 'openssl from ports'. > > > > Sorry I meant apache2 uses OpenSSL from base.. So iam safe. Is this correct? Yes.
