On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:25:48 +0100
Landry Breuil <lan...@rhaalovely.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 08:54:04AM +0100, Christopher
> Zimmermann wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:10:27 +0100 (CET)
> > Antoine Jacoutot <ajacou...@bsdfrog.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi!
> > > > 
> > > > In the last week I tried to port seamonkey. I used
> > > > the
> > > 
> > > It has already been ported, see www/seamonkey in
> > > ports.
> > > 
> > 
> > Ok, thats true, but I tried to compile seamonkey 2.0.1.
> > The ports tree only contains 1.1.17.
> > 
> > I already managed to compile 2.0 without ports. Now with
> > seamonkey 2.0.1 as a port it fails with an undefined
> > reference for __tls_get_addr.
> > I won't have any time to work on this until March 2010.
> > So if someone wants to finish this, your welcome.
> > 
> > My (not yet working) port is attached.
> 
> Can you provide a diff against the current 1.1.17 port ?
> That'd be way simpler to read/analyse...

I could, but it wouldn't help you much. I named it
seamonkey20 as it is based on the firefox35 port. So you
should be able to simply do a tar xzf semonkey20.tar.gz in
your /usr/ports/www/

Christopher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to