On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:12:30PM +0100, Federico G. Schwindt wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 01:03:55PM +0200, Thomas Pfaff wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:11:44 +0100 > > Thomas Pfaff <tpf...@tp76.info> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:32:17 +0100 > > > Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <jas...@humppa.nl> wrote: > > > > > > > > apart from the big hurdle called 'xmms' there are only a few ports left > > > > that use it. > > > > > > > I guess I'm one of the few people that actually use XMMS but I suppose I > > > could switch to Audacious instead (I think this needs an sndio backend.) > > > > > > > Wrong, Audacious has an sndio backend based on my XMMS sndio backend. > > Thanks to whoever massaged it into an Audacious output plugin (fgsch?). > > Correct. > > > If I've understood correctly you're trying to get rid of programs that > > use GTK+1 so XMMS can now bite the dust for all I care ;-) > > I think zaurus people and whatnot still prefers xmms. > > f.- for now i'm going through the ports that use gtk+1 that aren't usefull anymore. if people still use xmms (and there are people that do), we'll have to find a way. but it's still quite a long way to having xmms as the only consumer of gtk+1.
cheers, jasper -- Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish.
