>Everytime an architecture switches to GCC4, there are dependency >changes for all ports that use MODULES=gcc4 and C++ on that arch. >Normally, this would require a PKGNAME bump. On the other hand, >the gcc4 switch is something of a flag day for that arch anyway. >So... >... to bump or not to bump?
When we are un-cautious about this, I would like to request a second approach: Gaurantee a crank before the next release happens.
