On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Federico G. Schwindt wrote: > > e.g. developing software in Python, having 2.5 around is useful for > > compatibility testing. So ports wouldn't need to be tested against 2.5, > > but it shouldn't be deleted either. > > ugh? if we have 2.5 in the tree, even if it's not the default we should > be testing with it. like we test 2.6 at the moment even when it's not the > default. why would that change?
2.6 was tested because it is supposed to become the default. -- Antoine
