2010/10/11 LEVAI Daniel <l...@ecentrum.hu>: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 20:46:20 +0200, Björn Ketelaars wrote: >> Diff to bring net/transmission to 2.10. >> >> Feedback? > > This doesn't apply cleanly on -current, and there is a problem when > patching: > > ===> Patching for transmission-2.10 > 3 out of 5 hunks failed--saving rejects to configure.ac.rej > ***> patch-configure_ac did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to third-party/Makefile.in.rej > ***> patch-third-party_Makefile_in did not apply cleanly > *** Error code 1 > > > Daniel > > -- > LÉVAI Dániel > PGP key ID = 0x83B63A8F > Key fingerprint = DBEC C66B A47A DFA2 792D 650C C69B BE4C 83B6 3A8F >
My fault. I forgot to 'cvs remove' before 'cvs diff -uN'... Included a new diff. Don't forget to update (!) your CVS tree before applying this diff. I'm only using transmission-daemon, so no GTK client for me. Therefor I cannot confirm if the busy-loop-issue - as reported by naddy [1] - still exist. [1] http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=128456477400877&w=2
transmission2.10.diff
Description: Binary data
