attached is a script
shows some problems
I think the "file name to patch" question I referenced will show up nicely
but here is perhaps the key element, given that you asked about cvs. So I went
to snapshot (11/22/10) from the mirror and in that part of the tree I got my
ports.tar.gz at the same time. I would like to think that would be just fine,
but maybe I am yet again dumb. In any case, I was at release, clean install,
and then this week I went to snapshot, and have not done any cvs stuff.
(Upgrade to snapshot via install48.iso in snapshots i386)
And one of the reasons for going to snapshot was there were a number of ports
asking for the patch file. So it is troubling.
________________________________
From: Landry Breuil <lan...@rhaalovely.net>
To: ports@openbsd.org
Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 12:26:19 AM
Subject: Re: boost
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 04:12:30PM -0800, Max Stalnaker wrote:
> This has that file name to patch: question showing up. I attached a log, but
>it
>
> all it really might say is where it stops.
>
> pkg_add -u worked ok.
Sorry, your mail makes no sense, neither does the log. make patch in
devel/boost works fine here, so make sure your cvs tree is clean.
You can also do 'PATCH_DEBUG=yes make patch' to have more info on what
happens.
Landry
Script started on Wed Nov 24 02:37:09 2010
$ pwd
/usr/ports/devel/boost
$ suid do mke k ake repackage
Password:
===> Cleaning for boost-1.42.0p5
rm -f /usr/ports/packages/i386/all/boost-1.42.0p5.tgz
/usr/ports/packages/i386/ftp/boost-1.42.0p5.tgz
/usr/ports/packages/i386/cdrom/boost-1.42.0p5.tgz
===> Patching for boost-1.42.0p5
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n] y
3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej
***> patch-Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly
No such line 92 in input file, ignoring
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_detail_atomic_count_hpp did not apply cleanly
10 out of 13 hunks failed--saving rejects to
boost/function/function_base.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_function_function_base_hpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
boost/regex/v4/basic_regex_parser.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_regex_v4_basic_regex_parser_hpp did not apply cleanly
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n] y
2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej
***> patch-configure did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
libs/regex/test/regress/test_perl_ex.cpp.rej
***> patch-libs_regex_test_regress_test_perl_ex_cpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
libs/serialization/build/Jamfile.v2.rej
***> patch-libs_serialization_build_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly
2 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to
libs/serialization/test/Jamfile.v2.rej
***> patch-libs_serialization_test_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2347 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 1681 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2242 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2222 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 3308 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
$ sudo make clean
===> Cleaning for boost-1.42.0p5
$ sudo make repak ckage
===> Cleaning for boost-1.42.0p5
rm -f /usr/ports/packages/i386/all/boost-1.42.0p5.tgz
/usr/ports/packages/i386/ftp/boost-1.42.0p5.tgz
/usr/ports/packages/i386/cdrom/boost-1.42.0p5.tgz
===> Checking files for boost-1.42.0p5
`/usr/ports/distfiles/boost_1_42_0.tar.gz' is up to date.
>> (SHA256) boost_1_42_0.tar.gz: OK
===> boost-1.42.0p5 depends on: python->=2.6,<2.7 - found
===> Verifying specs: c m pthread stdc++ util z c m pthread stdc++ util z
===> found c.58.0 m.5.2 pthread.13.1 stdc++.50.0 util.11.2 z.4.1
===> Extracting for boost-1.42.0p5
===> Patching for boost-1.42.0p5
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n] y
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n] y
3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej
***> patch-Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly
No such line 92 in input file, ignoring
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_detail_atomic_count_hpp did not apply cleanly
10 out of 13 hunks failed--saving rejects to
boost/function/function_base.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_function_function_base_hpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
boost/regex/v4/basic_regex_parser.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_regex_v4_basic_regex_parser_hpp did not apply cleanly
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n] y
2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej
***> patch-configure did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
libs/regex/test/regress/test_perl_ex.cpp.rej
***> patch-libs_regex_test_regress_test_perl_ex_cpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
libs/serialization/build/Jamfile.v2.rej
***> patch-libs_serialization_build_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly
2 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to
libs/serialization/test/Jamfile.v2.rej
***> patch-libs_serialization_test_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2347 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 1681 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2242 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2222 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 3308 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
$ sudo PATCH_DEBUG=yes TC_DEBUG=yes make
poatc atch
===> Patching for boost-1.42.0p5
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch: y
No file found--skip this patch? [n] y
3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to y.rej
***> patch-Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Jamroot.rej
***> patch-Jamroot did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
boost/archive/impl/basic_text_iprimitive.ipp.rej
***> patch-boost_archive_impl_basic_text_iprimitive_ipp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
boost/archive/iterators/remove_whitespace.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_archive_iterators_remove_whitespace_hpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
boost/asio/detail/pipe_select_interrupter.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_asio_detail_pipe_select_interrupter_hpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to boost/asio/detail/socket_ops.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_asio_detail_socket_ops_hpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
boost/config/stdlib/libstdcpp3.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_config_stdlib_libstdcpp3_hpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to boost/config/suffix.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_config_suffix_hpp did not apply cleanly
No such line 92 in input file, ignoring
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_detail_atomic_count_hpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to boost/detail/endian.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_detail_endian_hpp did not apply cleanly
10 out of 13 hunks failed--saving rejects to
boost/function/function_base.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_function_function_base_hpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
boost/function/function_template.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_function_function_template_hpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
boost/math/special_functions/expm1.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_math_special_functions_expm1_hpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
boost/math/special_functions/log1p.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_math_special_functions_log1p_hpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to boost/math/tools/config.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_math_tools_config_hpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
boost/property_tree/detail/xml_parser_read_rapidxml.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_property_tree_detail_xml_parser_read_rapidxml_hpp did not
apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to boost/regex/config.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_regex_config_hpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
boost/regex/v4/basic_regex_parser.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_regex_v4_basic_regex_parser_hpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
boost/smart_ptr/detail/atomic_count.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_smart_ptr_detail_atomic_count_hpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp.rej
***> patch-boost_test_impl_execution_monitor_ipp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to boost/throw_exception.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_throw_exception_hpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to boost/wave/token_ids.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_wave_token_ids_hpp did not apply cleanly
File to patch: y
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
patch: **** can't find y
***> patch-configure did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to libs/config/configure.rej
***> patch-libs_config_configure did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
libs/config/test/boost_has_clock_gettime.ipp.rej
***> patch-libs_config_test_boost_has_clock_gettime_ipp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
libs/config/test/boost_has_pthread_yield.ipp.rej
***> patch-libs_config_test_boost_has_pthread_yield_ipp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
libs/detail/utf8_codecvt_facet.cpp.rej
***> patch-libs_detail_utf8_codecvt_facet_cpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to libs/random/random_device.cpp.rej
***> patch-libs_random_random_device_cpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
libs/regex/src/regex_traits_defaults.cpp.rej
***> patch-libs_regex_src_regex_traits_defaults_cpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
libs/regex/src/wc_regex_traits.cpp.rej
***> patch-libs_regex_src_wc_regex_traits_cpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
libs/regex/test/regress/test_perl_ex.cpp.rej
***> patch-libs_regex_test_regress_test_perl_ex_cpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
libs/serialization/build/Jamfile.v2.rej
***> patch-libs_serialization_build_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
libs/serialization/src/stl_port.cpp.rej
***> patch-libs_serialization_src_stl_port_cpp did not apply cleanly
2 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to
libs/serialization/test/Jamfile.v2.rej
***> patch-libs_serialization_test_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
5 out of 5 hunks ignored--saving rejects to tools/build/v2/tools/gcc.jam.rej
***> patch-tools_build_v2_tools_gcc_jam did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to tools/build/v2/tools/python.jam.rej
***> patch-tools_build_v2_tools_python_jam did not apply cleanly
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2347 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2222 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
$ sud9 o make clean
===> Cleaning for boost-1.42.0p5
$
$ sudo make clean
$ sudo PATC_DEBUG=yes make patch
===> boost-1.42.0p5 depends on: python->=2.6,<2.7 - found
===> Verifying specs: c m pthread stdc++ util z c m pthread stdc++ util z
===> found c.58.0 m.5.2 pthread.13.1 stdc++.50.0 util.11.2 z.4.1
===> Checking files for boost-1.42.0p5
`/usr/ports/distfiles/boost_1_42_0.tar.gz' is up to date.
>> (SHA256) boost_1_42_0.tar.gz: OK
===> Extracting for boost-1.42.0p5
===> Patching for boost-1.42.0p5
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n] y
3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej
***> patch-Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly
No such line 92 in input file, ignoring
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_detail_atomic_count_hpp did not apply cleanly
10 out of 13 hunks failed--saving rejects to
boost/function/function_base.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_function_function_base_hpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
boost/regex/v4/basic_regex_parser.hpp.rej
***> patch-boost_regex_v4_basic_regex_parser_hpp did not apply cleanly
File to patch: y
No file found--skip this patch? [n] y
2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to y.rej
***> patch-configure did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
libs/regex/test/regress/test_perl_ex.cpp.rej
***> patch-libs_regex_test_regress_test_perl_ex_cpp did not apply cleanly
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to
libs/serialization/build/Jamfile.v2.rej
***> patch-libs_serialization_build_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly
2 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to
libs/serialization/test/Jamfile.v2.rej
***> patch-libs_serialization_test_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2347 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2222 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
$ sudo make clean
===> Cleaning for boost-1.42.0p5
$
$ sudo make clean
$ sudo PATC_DEBUG=yes make patch H_DEBUG=yes make
patch
===> boost-1.42.0p5 depends on: python->=2.6,<2.7 - found
===> Verifying specs: c m pthread stdc++ util z c m pthread stdc++ util z
===> found c.58.0 m.5.2 pthread.13.1 stdc++.50.0 util.11.2 z.4.1
===> Checking files for boost-1.42.0p5
`/usr/ports/distfiles/boost_1_42_0.tar.gz' is up to date.
>> (SHA256) boost_1_42_0.tar.gz: OK
===> Extracting for boost-1.42.0p5
===> Patching for boost-1.42.0p5
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-Jamfile_v2
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-Jamfile_v2,v 1.1 2008/04/03 07:44:39 bernd Exp $
|--- Jamfile.v2.orig Tue May 29 19:46:37 2007
|+++ Jamfile.v2 Wed Jan 9 21:57:39 2008
--------------------------
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n] y
Skipping patch...
Hunk #1 ignored at 110.
Hunk #2 ignored at 175.
Hunk #3 ignored at 232.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej
done
***> patch-Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-Jamroot
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-Jamroot,v 1.2 2010/04/21 09:26:58 landry Exp $
|--- Jamroot.orig Sun Jan 24 21:43:34 2010
|+++ Jamroot Wed Apr 21 09:38:38 2010
--------------------------
Patching file Jamroot using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 138.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 370.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 391.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_archive_impl_basic_text_iprimitive_ipp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_archive_impl_basic_text_iprimitive_ipp,v 1.2 2010/04/21
09:26:58 landry Exp $
|--- boost/archive/impl/basic_text_iprimitive.ipp.orig Sat Dec 5 07:32:01 2009
|+++ boost/archive/impl/basic_text_iprimitive.ipp Thu Apr 8 13:37:44 2010
--------------------------
Patching file boost/archive/impl/basic_text_iprimitive.ipp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 45.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch
patch-boost_archive_iterators_remove_whitespace_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_archive_iterators_remove_whitespace_hpp,v 1.1 2010/03/30
11:01:10 robert Exp $
|--- boost/archive/iterators/remove_whitespace.hpp.orig Sun Dec 20 14:40:29 2009
|+++ boost/archive/iterators/remove_whitespace.hpp Sun Dec 20 19:07:34 2009
--------------------------
Patching file boost/archive/iterators/remove_whitespace.hpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 16.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 25.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 72.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch
patch-boost_asio_detail_pipe_select_interrupter_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_asio_detail_pipe_select_interrupter_hpp,v 1.1 2010/03/30
11:01:10 robert Exp $
|--- boost/asio/detail/pipe_select_interrupter.hpp.orig Tue May 12 18:05:45 2009
|+++ boost/asio/detail/pipe_select_interrupter.hpp Tue May 12 18:06:32 2009
--------------------------
Patching file boost/asio/detail/pipe_select_interrupter.hpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 27.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_asio_detail_socket_ops_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_asio_detail_socket_ops_hpp,v 1.1 2010/03/30 11:01:10
robert Exp $
|--- boost/asio/detail/socket_ops.hpp.orig Tue May 12 18:06:50 2009
|+++ boost/asio/detail/socket_ops.hpp Tue May 12 18:07:35 2009
--------------------------
Patching file boost/asio/detail/socket_ops.hpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 24.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_config_stdlib_libstdcpp3_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_config_stdlib_libstdcpp3_hpp,v 1.5 2010/03/30 11:00:15
robert Exp $
|--- boost/config/stdlib/libstdcpp3.hpp.orig Tue May 12 18:09:45 2009
|+++ boost/config/stdlib/libstdcpp3.hpp Tue May 12 18:15:20 2009
--------------------------
Patching file boost/config/stdlib/libstdcpp3.hpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 29.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 55.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_config_suffix_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_config_suffix_hpp,v 1.7 2010/03/30 11:00:15 robert Exp $
|--- boost/config/suffix.hpp.orig Tue May 12 18:19:58 2009
|+++ boost/config/suffix.hpp Tue May 12 18:21:48 2009
--------------------------
Patching file boost/config/suffix.hpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 225.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_detail_atomic_count_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_detail_atomic_count_hpp,v 1.1 2008/06/05 12:55:56 kurt
Exp $
|--- boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp.orig Wed Mar 30 17:52:54 2005
|+++ boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp Thu Jun 5 07:17:02 2008
--------------------------
Patching file boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp using Plan A...
No such line 92 in input file, ignoring
Hunk #1 failed at 93.
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp.rej
done
***> patch-boost_detail_atomic_count_hpp did not apply cleanly
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_detail_endian_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_detail_endian_hpp,v 1.3 2010/04/21 09:26:58 landry Exp $
|--- boost/detail/endian.hpp.orig Wed Apr 21 09:36:53 2010
|+++ boost/detail/endian.hpp Wed Apr 21 09:42:41 2010
--------------------------
Patching file boost/detail/endian.hpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 65.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_function_function_base_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_function_function_base_hpp,v 1.1 2008/04/03 07:44:40
bernd Exp $
|--- boost/function/function_base.hpp.orig Wed Jan 9 06:44:14 2008
|+++ boost/function/function_base.hpp Wed Jan 9 06:44:55 2008
--------------------------
Patching file boost/function/function_base.hpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 15.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 53 with fuzz 2 (offset 22 lines).
Hunk #3 failed at 96.
Hunk #4 failed at 235.
Hunk #5 failed at 252.
Hunk #6 failed at 302.
Hunk #7 failed at 324.
Hunk #8 failed at 385.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 511 (offset 128 lines).
Hunk #10 failed at 608.
Hunk #11 failed at 631.
Hunk #12 failed at 709.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 791 with fuzz 1 (offset 36 lines).
10 out of 13 hunks failed--saving rejects to
boost/function/function_base.hpp.rej
done
***> patch-boost_function_function_base_hpp did not apply cleanly
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_function_function_template_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_function_function_template_hpp,v 1.3 2010/04/30 20:08:02
espie Exp $
|--- boost/function/function_template.hpp.orig Fri Apr 30 21:01:11 2010
|+++ boost/function/function_template.hpp Fri Apr 30 21:02:15 2010
--------------------------
Patching file boost/function/function_template.hpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1000.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_math_special_functions_expm1_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_math_special_functions_expm1_hpp,v 1.1 2010/05/26
12:25:23 espie Exp $
|--- boost/math/special_functions/expm1.hpp.orig Wed May 26 11:30:30 2010
|+++ boost/math/special_functions/expm1.hpp Wed May 26 11:31:54 2010
--------------------------
Patching file boost/math/special_functions/expm1.hpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 268.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_math_special_functions_log1p_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_math_special_functions_log1p_hpp,v 1.1 2010/05/26
12:25:23 espie Exp $
|--- boost/math/special_functions/log1p.hpp.orig Wed May 26 11:33:17 2010
|+++ boost/math/special_functions/log1p.hpp Wed May 26 11:33:39 2010
--------------------------
Patching file boost/math/special_functions/log1p.hpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 329.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 341.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_math_tools_config_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_math_tools_config_hpp,v 1.1 2010/04/13 17:15:28 landry
Exp $
|--- boost/math/tools/config.hpp.orig Mon Apr 12 06:14:08 2010
|+++ boost/math/tools/config.hpp Mon Apr 12 06:14:38 2010
--------------------------
Patching file boost/math/tools/config.hpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 24.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch
patch-boost_property_tree_detail_xml_parser_read_rapidxml_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_property_tree_detail_xml_parser_read_rapidxml_hpp,v 1.1
2010/04/21 09:26:58 landry Exp $
|Cf http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2009/11/53805.php
|--- boost/property_tree/detail/xml_parser_read_rapidxml.hpp.orig Thu Apr
8 13:58:33 2010
|+++ boost/property_tree/detail/xml_parser_read_rapidxml.hpp Thu Apr 8
14:10:47 2010
--------------------------
Patching file boost/property_tree/detail/xml_parser_read_rapidxml.hpp using
Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 118.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_regex_config_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_regex_config_hpp,v 1.2 2010/03/30 11:00:15 robert Exp $
|--- boost/regex/config.hpp.orig Sat Dec 26 15:48:19 2009
|+++ boost/regex/config.hpp Sat Dec 26 15:48:34 2009
--------------------------
Patching file boost/regex/config.hpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 75.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_regex_v4_basic_regex_parser_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_regex_v4_basic_regex_parser_hpp,v 1.1 2008/05/27
00:52:01 deanna Exp $
|--- boost/regex/v4/basic_regex_parser.hpp.orig Wed Dec 20 12:19:05 2006
|+++ boost/regex/v4/basic_regex_parser.hpp Sun May 25 21:59:07 2008
--------------------------
Patching file boost/regex/v4/basic_regex_parser.hpp using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y]
Hunk #1 succeeded at 970 (offset 193 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 2278 (offset 416 lines).
Hunk #3 failed at 2286.
1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to
boost/regex/v4/basic_regex_parser.hpp.rej
done
***> patch-boost_regex_v4_basic_regex_parser_hpp did not apply cleanly
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_regex_v4_c_regex_traits_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_regex_v4_c_regex_traits_hpp,v 1.1 2010/03/30 11:01:10
robert Exp $
|--- boost/regex/v4/c_regex_traits.hpp.orig Tue Dec 22 17:25:03 2009
|+++ boost/regex/v4/c_regex_traits.hpp Thu Dec 24 14:05:47 2009
--------------------------
Patching file boost/regex/v4/c_regex_traits.hpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 34.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_smart_ptr_detail_atomic_count_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_smart_ptr_detail_atomic_count_hpp,v 1.1 2010/03/30
11:01:10 robert Exp $
|--- boost/smart_ptr/detail/atomic_count.hpp.orig Tue May 12 18:25:41 2009
|+++ boost/smart_ptr/detail/atomic_count.hpp Tue May 12 18:34:18 2009
--------------------------
Patching file boost/smart_ptr/detail/atomic_count.hpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 101.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_test_impl_execution_monitor_ipp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_test_impl_execution_monitor_ipp,v 1.2 2010/09/19
20:47:29 jasper Exp $
|--- boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp.orig Sat Nov 28 10:19:18 2009
|+++ boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp Sun Sep 19 22:33:20 2010
--------------------------
Patching file boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 341.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_throw_exception_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_throw_exception_hpp,v 1.2 2010/04/21 09:26:58 landry Exp
$
|Fix for /usr/local/include/boost/throw_exception.hpp:57: warning:
|`inline' is not at beginning of declaration which makes -Werror
|configure scripts bomb
|--- boost/throw_exception.hpp.orig Tue Dec 22 21:59:23 2009
|+++ boost/throw_exception.hpp Thu Apr 8 13:36:37 2010
--------------------------
Patching file boost/throw_exception.hpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 55.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_wave_token_ids_hpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-boost_wave_token_ids_hpp,v 1.3 2010/03/30 11:01:10 robert Exp $
|--- boost/wave/token_ids.hpp.orig Sun Dec 20 19:48:02 2009
|+++ boost/wave/token_ids.hpp Sun Dec 20 19:49:32 2009
--------------------------
Patching file boost/wave/token_ids.hpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 27.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-configure
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-configure,v 1.2 2008/04/03 07:44:40 bernd Exp $
|--- configure.orig Thu May 10 01:09:39 2007
|+++ configure Wed Jan 9 08:01:33 2008
--------------------------
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n]
File to patch:
No file found--skip this patch? [n] y
Skipping patch...
Hunk #1 ignored at 9.
Hunk #2 ignored at 325.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej
done
***> patch-configure did not apply cleanly
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_config_configure
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-libs_config_configure,v 1.2 2008/01/06 00:01:15 deanna Exp $
|--- libs/config/configure.orig Thu Nov 3 06:23:34 2005
|+++ libs/config/configure Mon Dec 31 02:29:05 2007
--------------------------
Patching file libs/config/configure using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1955.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 2024.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_config_test_boost_has_clock_gettime_ipp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-libs_config_test_boost_has_clock_gettime_ipp,v 1.2 2010/03/30
11:00:15 robert Exp $
|--- libs/config/test/boost_has_clock_gettime.ipp.orig Tue May 12 18:35:20 2009
|+++ libs/config/test/boost_has_clock_gettime.ipp Tue May 12 18:35:43 2009
--------------------------
Patching file libs/config/test/boost_has_clock_gettime.ipp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 10.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_config_test_boost_has_pthread_yield_ipp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-libs_config_test_boost_has_pthread_yield_ipp,v 1.2 2010/03/30
11:00:15 robert Exp $
|--- libs/config/test/boost_has_pthread_yield.ipp.orig Tue May 12 18:36:21 2009
|+++ libs/config/test/boost_has_pthread_yield.ipp Tue May 12 18:36:56 2009
--------------------------
Patching file libs/config/test/boost_has_pthread_yield.ipp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 17.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_detail_utf8_codecvt_facet_cpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-libs_detail_utf8_codecvt_facet_cpp,v 1.1 2010/03/30 11:01:10
robert Exp $
|--- libs/detail/utf8_codecvt_facet.cpp.orig Sun Dec 20 11:11:19 2009
|+++ libs/detail/utf8_codecvt_facet.cpp Sun Dec 20 11:21:24 2009
--------------------------
Patching file libs/detail/utf8_codecvt_facet.cpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 13.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_random_random_device_cpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-libs_random_random_device_cpp,v 1.2 2010/03/30 11:00:15 robert
Exp $
|--- libs/random/random_device.cpp.orig Tue May 12 18:37:39 2009
|+++ libs/random/random_device.cpp Tue May 12 18:38:44 2009
--------------------------
Patching file libs/random/random_device.cpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 22.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 90.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_regex_src_regex_traits_defaults_cpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-libs_regex_src_regex_traits_defaults_cpp,v 1.1 2010/03/30
11:01:10 robert Exp $
|--- libs/regex/src/regex_traits_defaults.cpp.orig Thu Dec 24 14:06:42 2009
|+++ libs/regex/src/regex_traits_defaults.cpp Thu Dec 24 14:08:17 2009
--------------------------
Patching file libs/regex/src/regex_traits_defaults.cpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 35.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_regex_src_wc_regex_traits_cpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-libs_regex_src_wc_regex_traits_cpp,v 1.2 2010/03/30 11:00:15
robert Exp $
|--- libs/regex/src/wc_regex_traits.cpp.orig Mon Aug 3 14:00:07 2009
|+++ libs/regex/src/wc_regex_traits.cpp Thu Dec 24 14:11:11 2009
--------------------------
Patching file libs/regex/src/wc_regex_traits.cpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 77.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_regex_test_regress_test_perl_ex_cpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-libs_regex_test_regress_test_perl_ex_cpp,v 1.1 2008/05/27
00:52:01 deanna Exp $
|--- libs/regex/test/regress/test_perl_ex.cpp.orig Wed Sep 14 08:20:08 2005
|+++ libs/regex/test/regress/test_perl_ex.cpp Sun May 25 21:59:48 2008
--------------------------
Patching file libs/regex/test/regress/test_perl_ex.cpp using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y]
Hunk #1 succeeded at 121.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_serialization_build_Jamfile_v2
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-libs_serialization_build_Jamfile_v2,v 1.1 2008/04/03 07:44:40
bernd Exp $
|--- libs/serialization/build/Jamfile.v2.orig Wed Jan 9 23:17:23 2008
|+++ libs/serialization/build/Jamfile.v2 Wed Jan 9 23:17:31 2008
--------------------------
Patching file libs/serialization/build/Jamfile.v2 using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y]
Hunk #1 succeeded at 61 with fuzz 2.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_serialization_src_stl_port_cpp
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-libs_serialization_src_stl_port_cpp,v 1.2 2008/01/06 00:01:15
deanna Exp $
|--- libs/serialization/src/stl_port.cpp.orig Sat Feb 19 16:08:02 2005
|+++ libs/serialization/src/stl_port.cpp Mon Dec 31 02:29:05 2007
--------------------------
Patching file libs/serialization/src/stl_port.cpp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 31 (offset -1 lines).
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_serialization_test_Jamfile_v2
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-libs_serialization_test_Jamfile_v2,v 1.1 2008/04/03 07:44:40
bernd Exp $
|--- libs/serialization/test/Jamfile.v2.orig Wed Jan 9 21:54:47 2008
|+++ libs/serialization/test/Jamfile.v2 Wed Jan 9 21:54:51 2008
--------------------------
Patching file libs/serialization/test/Jamfile.v2 using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 114.
Hunk #2 failed at 133.
2 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to
libs/serialization/test/Jamfile.v2.rej
done
***> patch-libs_serialization_test_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_build_v2_tools_gcc_jam
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-tools_build_v2_tools_gcc_jam,v 1.3 2010/03/30 11:00:15 robert
Exp $
|--- tools/build/v2/tools/gcc.jam.orig Wed Oct 28 08:47:51 2009
|+++ tools/build/v2/tools/gcc.jam Sat Dec 26 09:57:06 2009
--------------------------
Patching file tools/build/v2/tools/gcc.jam using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 269.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 299.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 473.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 797.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 858.
done
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_build_v2_tools_python_jam
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-tools_build_v2_tools_python_jam,v 1.3 2009/07/27 00:34:24 kurt
Exp $
|--- tools/build/v2/tools/python.jam.orig Wed Jan 9 03:11:51 2008
|+++ tools/build/v2/tools/python.jam Wed Jan 9 03:16:32 2008
--------------------------
Patching file tools/build/v2/tools/python.jam using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 648 with fuzz 1 (offset 25 lines).
done
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2347 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2222 of
/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
$ exit
Script done on Wed Nov 24 02:45:22 2010
