On Dec 30, 2010, at 8:33 PM, Edd Barrett wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 08:09:54PM -0500, Chad M Stewart wrote: >> Various reasons, but your right using packages would be faster. This really >> gets me as I've built many ports before, usually very easy to do. >> > > Have you aliased 'make' to anything?
No. autoload='typeset -fu' functions='typeset -f' hash='alias -t' history='fc -l' integer='typeset -i' local=typeset login='exec login' nohup='nohup ' r='fc -e -' stop='kill -STOP' suspend='kill -STOP $$' type='whence -v' > > Checked mk.conf? Does not exist. > > Where did you get ports from? I don't recall right now, but to rule that out I grabbed a new copy from a mirror I've never used and then cd /usr mv ports ports.old && rm -rf ports.old tar xfz /root/ports.tar.gz Exact same problem continues, ran a diff -b on both sources of the ports.tar.gz file, no differences. Then grabbed it from a mirror outside of the US, no difference from the other two. The sha is SHA256 (ports.tar.gz) = e748cb13a47b1bd6bbafa7f85acc108ebd8a59f4101c5b37570bc327dfe876a9 I've even tried ports from -stable via CVS, same error. For kicks, I tried -current ports (with the rest of the system being -release) and it gives the same error. I didn't expect -current to work, but figured it was worth a try. I'm at a loss. -Chad