On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 04:15:41PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I don't think there's any possible way OpenBSD would be willing to > place restrictions on what users might do with the software, therefore > we may not redistribute it, so it's PERMIT_*=No.
There's a clear consensus on PERMIT_*=no, so here's a new version with PERMIT_*=no. landry@ is/was ok with this (changed) port (http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=130013481508894&w=2, http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=130027658522756&w=2); you had your doubts (above) and jasper@ explicitly advocated not importing it (http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=130029302211212&w=2). Theo strongly dislikes the license (http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=130029335311626&w=2), but also said "As long as the marker is correct, the ports tree can point to non-free code." Could someone please import this or tell me to stop wasting everyone's time? Joachim P.S. Feel free to add a MESSAGE if you want, but I don't think that makes much sense: it's impossible to "mis-"use an unpatched tarsnap since tarsnap.com and some public keys are hardcoded, and people can be expected to read the license (marker) before patching it.
tarsnap.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
