On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Rafael Sadowski <raf...@sizeofvoid.org> wrote: > On Fri Mar 18, 2011 at 09:17:23PM +0500, Alexandr Shadchin wrote: >> I prepared diff update x11/fvwm2 to 2.5.31 (on request and test mikeb@) >> >> current x11/fvwm2 - 2.4.20 (stable branch) >> last version fvwm2 - 2.5.31 (unstable branch) >> >> mikeb@ work with 2.5, no regression found. >> >> What should I do? Update current port, or separate port(fvwm2-devel)? >> > I don't think that any work with stable branch. In my opinion, separate > port like fvwm2-devel is the best choice but perhaps, a port like mutt > with subdirs stable and snapshot (for fvmw unsable) is also good.
Previously it seemed silly to have 2 versions... what's the motivation not to stick with -stable? I'm really curious. I really don't see the point of two versions, but if there is such a demand, then stable/snapshot model makes sense.
