On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:17:00PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Port is pretty much ok (though you could use MODCPAN_EXAMPLES_DIST=eg > and the post-extract is unnecessary).
post-extract is needed as regress target will fail otherwise. > But I wonder what it offers to make it worth adding a 4th > youtube downloader to the tree when we already have net/yt, > www/youtube-dl, and multimedia/get_flash_videos? Well, I'm using it. I can use WWW::YouTube::Download in my perl code. I probably could use part of get_flash_videos as well, but didn't realize that untill I've started using p5-WWW-YouTube-Download. Re MODCPAN_EXAMPLES_DIST, updated port attached. -- best regards q#
p5-WWW-YouTube-Download.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
