Amit Kulkarni <amitk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I stumbled on something which makes me ask a question to you guys.
> Why is ports/print/freetype at version 1 and freetype2 included in
> /usr/xenocara/lib/freetype?

They're incompatible and there's still some stuff in ports that
depends on the ancient freetype1.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          na...@mips.inka.de

Reply via email to