On 29/07/11 4:59 PM, Todd T. Fries wrote:
Penned by Stuart Henderson on 20110729 5:43.55, we have:
| On 2011-07-29, David Coppa<dco...@gmail.com> wrote:
|> It should be better to not lure people into using kqemu: it's buggy
|> and unmaintained
|
| How about this ... Brad? Todd? any developers who need qemu?
| OK?
Sounds like henning@ was one who complained about slowness in the past, but
he is definately using the newer one in most places now.
One comment was that perhaps the upgrade to qemu from qemu-old be handled
properly, then this can get removed...
That would require adding a quirks entry?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
