On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:02:06 +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:09:32 +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 03:37:16PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > > > The -Wbounded warning is caused by somewhat strange and conflicting > > > definitions for FILNMLEN/E_FILNMLEN in coff/*.h. Unless anyone cares > > > about long NT filenames, I think we should just remove support for those > > > until the gdb/bfd people sort this out and make the defines consistent. > > > It probably wouldn't work anyway due to memcpy overflows. > > > > > > Unfortunately, loading core files still doesn't work (at least on > > > amd64), but iirc that has never been the case with the new gdb. > > > > According to kettenis, gdb from cvs current compiles like a charm. > > Can you try to filch the corresponding change instead ? > > I asked Mark, but he doesn't appear to have the time... > > Okay, this is _extremely_ strange: gdb from CVS obviously uses > libbfd from the same repository, so I went there looking for peigen.c. > And guess what: It has been removed *10 years ago*. That's right, > gdb still includes and compiles that file in its own version of > libbfd (claiming to be from mid 2010 according to the change log). > Looks like they just forgot to remove it from the repo they create > their tarballs from. Or maybe they did this on purpose, I have no > idea. Anyway: Ouch. (Funny thing is that bfd/ChangeLog-0001 even > has an entry for peigen.c as being deleted.) > > http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/Attic/peigen.c?cvsroot=src&h > ideattic=0 > >
Ignore that, please. GNU code can be confusing ... (peigen.c is generated now.) However, libbfd from CVS does _not_ build at the moment on OpenBSD (same error). It's not fixed upstream.
