On 2011-10-21, Rod Whitworth <glis...@witworx.com> wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:23:28 -0400, Lawrence Teo wrote: > > Are you sure that the above changes are what you really want? > > I don't have access to my build machine ATM to do any real checking but > that segment I quoted above looks strange to my bleary eye.
This is a diff of a diff, they are always hard to read. You get used to it after working on ports for a while! >>- # Registration file: >>- # Where to store the current registrations. >>- # An empty value means we do not save registrations. Make sure that >>+ # Memory settings This is a change in the context of a line which is being patched. (i.e. it's syncing with a change in the original file). >>+@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ user = nobody >> # the specified directory path does exist! >>+ # Note: If running in chroot jail, this path starts relative >>+ # to the jail. >> -registration_file = /var/lib/siproxd/siproxd_registrations >> +registration_file = siproxd_registrations This is ok, the default config did not run in a chroot jail, the port is changing this so this change is reasonable. However I think it may be slightly more clear to use "registration_file = /siproxd_registrations".
