On Dec 10 22:37:38, Jan Stary wrote: > I am trying again to get this AMR port commited: > http://stare.cz/~hans/.tmp/opencore-amr-0.1.2.tar.gz
On Dec 10 14:06:27, Marc Espie wrote:
> There's been some recent confusion as to which version of a patch someone
> was referring to, because it was an external link, and the external link
> got changed to something else.
>
> That's a common rookie mistake: as soon as you publish/send a patch link
> to someone, consider that link "eternal". If you change the patch later,
> it's totally trivial to give it a version number, and *make sure to provide
> a different link*.
>
> Otherwise, it's really easy to lose track and attribution. And such mix-ups
> tend to lead to the wrong code being committed ('but he said it was okay....
> nah, I never saw that version of the patch....'), which leads to further
> time lost to figure out the fuck-up...
>
>
> Also, your work may be more easily/quickly reviewed if it's included
> *directly* in your email.
>
> People with commit access are chronically overworked. every small thing you
> can do to make things easier is generally appreciated, thank you.
OK, I get it. Sorry. Attached is the current state of opencore-amr.
Jan
opencore-amr-0.1.2.tar.gz
Description: application/tar-gz
