On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 05:18:05PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 04:57:37PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > Hi. > > > > So after chatting with espie we came to the conclusion than putting > > additionnal files under FILESDIR isn't really worth it. > > Despites a handfull number of ports that have >=8 files in that directory, > > most ports only have 1 to 3 files. > > Our idea is to move these files to the current directory (where the port > > Makefile is) for simplicity instead of creating 1 extra directory to put 1 > > extra file. > > > > As agreed with espie, I will do the work but before I go I want to make > > sure there are no hard objections to this. > > Now is the time to speak-up :) > > > Isn't there at least one port where a file in FILESDIR is called Makefile?
It's not really a big problem, either you copy/link it into WRKDIR, or if you use the file itself, you have to set MAKE_FILE anyways. in fact, that would make things less confusing, as when you find /usr/ports -name Makefile, you would only get the actual ports Makefiles.
