On Saturday 17 March 2012 19:02:46 Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Antti Harri <i...@openbsd.fi> wrote: > > Fileutils, sh-utils and textutils have been combined into coreutils > > package in 2003 according to <http://www.gnu.org/software/fileutils/ > > fileutils>. Should those three ports be replaced with a single > > "coreutils" or "gnucoreutils" package instead of fixing those three > > separately? > > Yes. > > I also think we should use this opportunity to kill the gnuls > subpackage. If people want ls with colors, they are better off > with colorls, and if they really insist, they can still install > coreutils.
Makes sense. Can someone check the attached tarball? I'm sure it has room for improvement as I did it pretty hastily. I'm going to call it a day so I'm submitting it now. :-) Does the .so in libexec need special handling? Can some of the pkgpath/conflict markers be combined and are they correct? Didn't have time to build libc with the getline patch, but I hope the gnu folks have gotten it right in a decade.. -- Antti Harri
coreutils.tar.gz
Description: application/tgz
