Anyone?
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
<acam...@the00z.org> wrote:
> RUN_DEPENDS in meta/zathura/Makefile shouldn't be:
>
> RUN_DEPENDS = textproc/zathura-core ?
>
> it currently is:
>
> RUN_DEPENDS = textproc/zathura \
>
> Isn't textproc/zathura supposed to be deleted...? Or I'm missing something...
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Edd Barrett <vex...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Any further comments? Can I commit this?
>>
>> On Aug 9, 2012 3:24 PM, "Edd Barrett" <vex...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Zathura-0.2.0 again; this time with all the plugins (bar one which is
>>> broken).
>>>
>>> The plan is still the same: blast away textproc/zathura in favor of
>>> meta/zathura with @pkgpath set. This was neccessary due to the new
>>> plugin architecture of zathura.
>>>
>>> Misc notes:
>>> - mupdf plugin is broken (our mupdf is too new). Can we import this
>>> plugin unlinked? Upstream are working on this as we speak.
>>> - ps plugin does not support searching.
>>> - update path seems to work fine.
>>> - should the meta package contain *all* plugins? Currently contains
>>> only the poppler PDF plugin so as to emulate the old zathura-0.8.*.*.
>>>
>>> Comments? OK? Pizza?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards
>>> Edd Barrett
>>>
>>> http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
