In this diff I'm removed the patches to string function. Ok? Comments?
- Roman 2012/9/3 Alexey Suslikov <alexey.susli...@gmail.com> > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2012/09/02 19:42, Roman Kravchuk wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Update for kamailio to 3.3.1 > > > > > > Tested on amd64. > > > > > > Ok? Comments? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > - Roman > > > > Haven't looked fully yet, but I'm not terribly keen on the patches > > to string functions, I'd prefer if they were fed upstream instead of > > going via patches in the ports tree.. > > Some upstreams are friendly, some aren't. Pushing safe string > functions diffs upstream may take some time. Maybe even very > long time. > > Moreover, kamalio is somewhat specific. I don't think we will > receive a number of testing reports. > > Roman did a lot of porting work and testing. I know his earlier > ports used for carrier interconnects in production environments. > > Can this port be committed without above mentioned diffs and > updated afterwards (if upstream will be friendly enough)? > > Alexey >
kamailio-3.3.1.diff
Description: Binary data
