(Starting a new thread) Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> writes:
> On 2012/09/06 20:51, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: >> > Rowdy OpenBSD <rowdy.open...@gmail.com> writes: >> > >> >> As with the emacs23 port, the no_x11 flavour of your port requires >> >> dbus, which requires X. To fix this, add "--without-dbus >> >> --without-gconf" to CONFIGURE_ARGS for the no_x11 flavour and update >> >> WANTLIB and LIB_DEPENDS appropriately. >> > >> > I didn't know libdbus was bringing in X11, where should I look for this >> > kind of information...? Anyway, running emacs-24.2-no_x11 in a console >> > works fine, even with no access to /usr/X11R6. >> (Works fine also with no dbus session active) >> >> If you want this port not to depend on dbus just because you want to >> build it on a machine with no X libraries, just say so. But please >> don't let me find it the hard way. > > Build, no. It is expected that you have *all* the sets installed > if you're building from ports. > > But a no_x11 flavour shouldn't depend on something that requires > X in order to install and run. Then I guess Rowdy OpenBSD is right. One can't install dbus without having the proper X libraries. I see that some other distros have a kind of "no_x11 flavor" of dbus. Has it already been discussed? Would that be desirable in the OpenBSD ports system? Else, I'd just disable D-Bus support for the no_x11 Emacs flavor. Regards, -- Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas GPG fingerprint: 61DB D9A0 00A4 67CF 2A90 8961 6191 8FBF 06A1 1494
pgpnVCJODqPv8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
