Starting in ruby 1.9.3, ruby's dbm extension picks up the libc db code
and does not use databases/db4, so fix the dependencies.
Because of this, I plan to drop the separate package for the dbm
extension in ruby 2.0. I debated doing that for ruby 1.9, but concluded
that it was not worth the effort.
OKs?
Jeremy
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/ruby/1.9/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -p -r1.30 Makefile
--- Makefile 20 Nov 2012 16:52:32 -0000 1.30
+++ Makefile 4 Dec 2012 17:33:50 -0000
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ PKGNAME-dbm = ruby-dbm-${VERSION}.${PAT
PKGNAME-tk = ruby-tk-${VERSION}.${PATCHLEVEL}
PKGNAME-ri_docs = ruby-ri_docs-${VERSION}.${PATCHLEVEL}
+REVISION-dbm = 0
+
PKG_ARCH-ri_docs = *
WANTLIB-ri_docs = # empty
@@ -60,9 +62,8 @@ LIB_DEPENDS-gdbm = databases/gdbm \
lang/ruby/${REV},-main>=${VERSION}.${PATCHLEVEL},<1.10
RUN_DEPENDS-gdbm =
-WANTLIB-dbm = c m db pthread ruby19
-LIB_DEPENDS-dbm = databases/db/v4 \
- lang/ruby/${REV},-main>=${VERSION}.${PATCHLEVEL},<1.10
+WANTLIB-dbm = c m pthread ruby19
+LIB_DEPENDS-dbm = lang/ruby/${REV},-main>=${VERSION}.${PATCHLEVEL},<1.10
RUN_DEPENDS-dbm =
.if !${FLAVOR:Mno_x11}
