On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 08:26:10AM -0700, Jeremy Evans wrote: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Mikolaj Kucharski > <miko...@kucharski.name>wrote: > > > I've tried and no joy -- regress is not happy, and regress is doing here > > some really invasive stuff, which will probably fail with systrace > > (untested). I'm attaching the output from make test. Also, below patch > > contains my debugging patches, which should probably be removed, but I > > kept them, so someone more experienced with Ruby and Ruby ports could > > have a look what should be done with that part of code, if anything > > actually needs to be done. > > > > Most of the remaining failures are due to other programs not being > found because of their extension (ruby/rackup/rake). You could > probably fix this by adding them to post-extract. > > The regress tests should probably be commented out by default, > since they are downloading gems. > > Are you upgrading bundler because a dependency requires a newer > version, or just to get the most current version? In either case, have > you verified the existing dependencies are OK with the newer version? > > Jeremy
To get the most current version. I got a bit out of practice in ports and I never had a chance to work with Ruby Gems, so picked this random Ruby port to see how porting Gems works. I did not had a chance to test anything yet. -- best regards q#
