On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 2:57 PM, David Coppa <dco...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Alexey Suslikov > <alexey.susli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Kirill Bychkov <ya...@linklevel.net> wrote: >>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 15:25, Alexey Suslikov wrote: >>>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Kirill Bychkov <ya...@linklevel.net> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 14:02, David Coppa wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Alexey Suslikov >>>>>> <alexey.susli...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Mostly cleanup update: >>>>>>> * remove dead HOMEPAGE >>>>>>> * MASTER_SITES changed >>>>>>> * new distinfo >>>>>>> * PFRAG.shared -> PLIST >>>>>> >>>>>> ok dcoppa@ for the dev who wants to do the commit >>>>>> >>>>>> ciao, >>>>>> David >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Is it OK to merge PFRAG into PLIST when it's not SHARED_ONLY port and it >>>>> have >>>>> .a an .la libs? >>>> >>>> .a and .la are for static linking, no? >>> >>> Yes. And we still have static archs which can't create .so lib. So it's >>> living >>> in PFRAG.shared and not built and installed on !shared archs. >> >> I see. Let's go without PLIST/PFRAG.shared chunks. Ok? > > your update has been already committed by sthen@
to clarify on that "special support" sthen@ mentioned. am I correctly understood, bsd.port.mk will not install .so on !shared if .a/.la specified, right?
