On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 09:33:25PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2013/06/16 15:37, Brad Smith wrote: > > On 16/06/13 2:31 PM, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote: > > >On Jun 16, 2013 3:30 PM, "Peter Hessler" <phess...@theapt.org> wrote: > > >>Then delete the port from the wip. Making it a graveyard for abandoned > > >>ports is a terrible thing. > > > > > >BTW, is there an actual graveyard? I believe having [semi-]official one > > >would be helpful for those wanting the software not in ports. > > > > openbsd-wip pretty much is a graveyard. > > > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > > > I've just trimmed it a bit of things which have already been committed. > People using it, note the WIP part of the name, *work-in-progress*, it's > not meant to be a dumping ground.. you still need to polish things, send > them out by email for review, etc..
I've added this note to README.md: "If you don't want work anymore in your half-finished or not-commited-yet port, please remove it from the repository. In the future, other people can rescue your work from the git history. A clean repository will avoid convert this in a graveyard." (I don't know if my english is correct or not) -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
