On 2013/08/13 11:43, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> > $ FLAVOR=no_qt SUBPACKAGE=-gtk make show=RUN_DEPENDS-gtk
> > transmission-2.82:net/transmission,no_qt devel/desktop-file-utils
> > x11/gtk+2,-guic
> >
> > $ SUBPACKAGE=-gtk make show=RUN_DEPENDS-gtk
> > transmission-2.82:net/transmission, devel/desktop-file-utils x11/gtk+2,-guic
>
> For usual FLAVORS it is so, but PSEUDO_FLAVORS are stripped from
> resulting plist (which is being written to package and to PLIST_DB).
> You can check this easy, just run:
>
> $ SUBPACKAGE=-gtk make print-plist-with-depends >/tmp/a
> $ FLAVOR=no_qt SUBPACKAGE=-gtk make print-plist-with-depends >/tmp/b
> $ cmp /tmp/{a,b} && echo "They are same!"
> They are same!
>
> Output of "make print-plist-with-depends" is what gets in PLIST_DB,
> just look in bsd.port.mk. Here is an excerpt with @depend lines:
>
> $ FLAVOR=no_qt SUBPACKAGE=-gtk make print-plist-with-depends | fgrep @depend
> @depend converters/libiconv:libiconv-*:libiconv-1.14p0
> @depend
> devel/desktop-file-utils:desktop-file-utils-*:desktop-file-utils-0.21p0
> @depend devel/gettext:gettext->=0.10.38:gettext-0.18.2p2
> @depend devel/libevent2:libevent-*:libevent-2.0.21
> @depend net/curl:curl-*:curl-7.26.0p2
> @depend net/miniupnp/libnatpmp:libnatpmp-*:libnatpmp-20120821
> @depend net/miniupnp/miniupnpc,-main:miniupnpc-*:miniupnpc-1.8
> @depend net/transmission,-main:transmission-2.82:transmission-2.82
> @depend
> x11/gtk+2,-guic:gtk-update-icon-cache-*:gtk-update-icon-cache-2.24.19p1
> @depend x11/gtk+3,-main:gtk+3-*:gtk+3-3.8.2p2
>
> No PSEUDO_FLAVORs there, as you can see. And that's the intended behaviour:
>
> PSEUDO_FLAVORS
> Extra list of flavors that do not register in package
> names, but are still used to control build logic, and work
> directory names. Its only use should be for disabling part
> of a multi-packages build, for instance:
>
> To proof my point, I just build transmission packages with my diff;
> first with "no_qt" FLAVOR, and then with empty FLAVOR. No complains
> from PLIST_DB, as expected.
>
> --
> WBR,
> Vadim Zhukov
Hmm, this is news to me, but thanks for the detailed explanation, no
objections from me then.
