2013/11/8 Stuart Cassoff <s...@bell.net>:
> On 10/01/13 14:41, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
>> On 10/01/13 12:07, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
>>> 2013/10/1 Stuart Cassoff <s...@bell.net>:
>>>> On 07/11/13 18:39, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
>>>>> On 07/11/13 17:21, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
>>>>>> 2013/7/7 Stuart Cassoff <s...@bell.net>:
>>>>>>> Tested by me for all types of substitution.
>>>>>>> Also, I've been running with it for a while with no adverse effects.
>>>>>>> I don't know which ports this will affect. Can't be too many.
>>>>>>> Does your previous patch cover them?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, it is; it contains all necessary bumps there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll test your patch more throughly at the weekend, and if things will
>>>>>> go smoothly, commit the whole pack.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Great!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your work on this.
>>>>
>>>> Where are we with this?
>>>
>>> Errrm... Looks like the weekend last too long. ^_^ Actually, it was
>>> near lock, IIRC... I'll handle this ASAP, thank you for reminding.
>>>
>>> --
>>>   WBR,
>>>   Vadim Zhukov
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Great. I too had forgotten.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Stu
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> FWIW I've been running with this for a while and I'm satisfied with it.
> I'd like to see it commited already, by me or anyone else.

Will do tomorrow, thank you for reminding.

--
  WBR,
  Vadim Zhukov

Reply via email to