Welcome, audit it. That would be cool. I guess divide code into separate
processes for gui, core and maybe database would be great.
I actually looked through patches. They obviously fix staff like include dirs.
So you can trust this port as you trust official source.
I don't really care about it since I haven't a LOT of bitcoins.
BTW I don't really understand how to perform reliable security audit.
Remember famous Linux backdoor example?
if ((options == (__WCLONE|__WALL)) && (current->uid = 0))
retval = -EINVAL;
I looked at this code 3 times before I understand where it is...
17.11.2013, 19:15, "Christian Weisgerber" <na...@mips.inka.de>:
> I think everybody who proposes a bitcoin port should consider whether
> something that seriously deals with people's money doesn't warrant
> special auditing and whether they are prepared to invest that work.
>
> I'm very uncomfortable with shipping our usual "it seems to build
> and run for me" packages and having naive users actually put their
> trust in them. But it is 0P3NB5D! 1T MU57 B3 S3KYOOR!
>
> --
> Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
