On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Federico Schwindt <fg...@lodoss.net> wrote:
> shouldn't this be centralized, i.e. in ruby.port.mk when setting the > default version? > That makes sense to me, though I haven't tried it. I'll get it tested in a bulk and see if there is any fallout. Thanks, Jeremy > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Jeremy Evans <jeremyeva...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Markus Lude <markus.l...@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> > >> > with the update of swig to 2.0.11 it doesn't build any more on sparc64. >> > MODULES lang/ruby uses ruby 2.0 per default now, which doesn't build on >> > sparc64. Does the new swig need the new ruby or is ruby 1.8 enough? >> > >> >> It still packages on amd64 with "MODRUBY_REV = 1.8". I suppose something >> like this may work if we want to build swig on sparc64/hppa/alpha without >> holding other arches back: >> >> .if ${MACHINE_ARCH:Msparc64} || ${MACHINE_ARCH:Mhppa} || >> ${MACHINE_ARCH:Malpha} >> MODRUBY_REV = 1.8 >> .endif >> >> Thanks, >> Jeremy >> > >