On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 05:02:58PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote: > > On 04/28/14 18:31, Brian Callahan wrote: > > > >On 04/28/14 01:47, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > >>Brian Callahan writes: > >>>On 04/18/14 10:06, Brian Callahan wrote: > >>>>Hi ports -- > >>>> > >>>>After missing a few versions (which, amazingly, shipped broken), > >>>>here's an update for MAME to its latest verison. > >>Did the licensing kerfuffle ever get resolved? (A few months ago Haze > >>complained about a unilateral license change made in the past without > >>getting the permission of the individual authors. That sort of thing > >>makes > >>me nervous.) > >> > > > >Good question. Haze appears to be working on MAME again but the licensing > >issue appears to have been "resolved" by nothing being done. FWIW: this > >would also affect the version of MAME we have in ports now. > > > > Do we have any consensus on what to do with MAME/MESS? I would like to get > this in.
emulators have always been on the fence wrt licencing issues, so i'd say move along, nothing to worry about there. I just find it weird it dropped its dependency on gtk... Landry
