On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 08:38:44PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 02:11:04PM -0700, Jeremy Evans wrote: > > This makes ruby 2.1 the default ruby version. Now that ruby 2.1.3 has > > been released, it makes sense to switch the default from ruby 2.0 to > > ruby 2.1. > > Thinking out loud, but is there still a point in having 4 different > versions in the tree ? We tried to reduce the number of pythons and > gccs... > > Landry
I hope ruby 1.8, at least, is on the way out. This is getting ridiculous.
