On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Stuart Henderson <st...@openbsd.org> wrote:
> On 2014/11/03 17:07, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2014/10/21 20:55, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
>> > >> This will break packaging of ports installing CMake package files (see
>> > >> the FooTargets.cmake and FooTargets-Release.cmake in PLIST files?)
>> > >> when DEBUG is specified.
>> > >
>> > > True, but by using DEBUG you are already drifting from regular packages; 
>> > > so you can probably manually fix that one when you need it.
>> >
>> > If there is one such package, yes, not a problem. When you have a few
>> > hundreds items of KDE stuff... Yes, I build debug packages regularily
>> > - still trying to catch misterious libkdcraw bug, and other problems
>> > do arise often, unfortunately.
>>
>> Discussed online but summarised here for those who weren't there,
>> we can set a variable to use in plists, e.g.
>>
>> MODCMAKE_BUILDTYPE = -release.cmake
>>
>> and add it to SUBST_VARS (at first I thought of just "-release", but if
>> we add the .cmake it makes things easier for "make plist").
>>
>> mariadb's default is to build with RelWithDebInfo which is....not small.
>>
>
> I just had another thought about this. Forcing "Release" might force some
> C optimizer flags that we don't want. I would have suggested diffing build
> logs, but ninja...

I already took care of this.
See patches/patch-Modules_Compiler_*

CIAO
David
-- 
"If you try a few times and give up, you'll never get there. But if
you keep at it... There's a lot of problems in the world which can
really be solved by applying two or three times the persistence that
other people will."
                -- Stewart Nelson

Reply via email to