On 11/16/14 17:10, jungle Boogie wrote: > Hello Nigel, On 12 November 2014 13:54, Nigel Taylor > <njtay...@asterisk.demon.co.uk> wrote: >> Try the attached .... >> > > Sorry, I'm not certain what I would do with a diff. Do I make a > patch with what's in ports now? > If you have /usr/ports upto date with cvs. Then you apply the diff by saving to ~ or other location then
cd /usr/ports/textproc/p5-ack patch -E -p0 <~/p5-ack.diff Then just build the package Otherwise you have to wait for the commit to cvs, and package to appear in a snapshot following a bulk build. >> a) I checked META.json / Makefile.pl for dependency changes / >> version requirement changes. Version is 1.10 not 1.1 for >> p5-File-Next, we have 1.12 so 1.10 check will pass. >> >> b) Tests some had been skipped because of missing dependencies, >> added the extra dependencies required for these tests. All tests >> do pass apart from one skipped test. The one test being skipped >> is unfinished upstream, even latest in github. Besides make test, >> make port-lib-depends-check, portcheck should be run, neither >> reported any issues, only tested on amd64. >> >> Also checked for other packages using p5-ack, none, so no >> additional checks required or carried out. >> >> There are a lot of upstream commits after 2.14, not sure how >> stable the 2.14 version is. ChangeLog contains a concern about >> problem introduced in 2.14, Commit history another, but ignored >> as related to a test. If some of these later changes are required >> the port needs patches adding until next version is released. >> >> > > That's interesting, hopefully it will be okay on openbsd. > > > Thanks for everyone writing in regarding this. > >> >> > > thanks, jb >
