On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Aaron Bieber <aa...@bolddaemon.com> wrote: > Aaron Bieber <aa...@bolddaemon.com> writes: > > Accidently only sent this to tedu@ :P > > Ted Unangst <t...@tedunangst.com> writes: > > On i386, it's better for a jit to ask for exec memory upfront, so uvm > knows to place it in the exec segment. Otherwise, if you mmap non-exec > and mprotect it, you wind up with a high mapping and the segment must > be enlarged to cover the whole process. > > I sent Mike a slightly different diff; this is what he ended up > committing to git. I think we should add it to the port. > > Here is the diff. I don't currently have an i386 box to test, so if > someone could try it, that would be awesome :D > > OK?
ok dcoppa@ ciao, David
