Adam Wolk said: > Tested on amd64 -current snapshot from May 20. The package is based > on devel/gocover.
I believe it should be called go-vet, not govet. The actual tool is called "vet", and the "go" prefix denotes that it is installed to subdirectory of ${LOCALBASE}/go instead of ${LOCALBASE}/bin. As evidenced in haskell, perl, python and ruby ports, we separate prefixes with dash. Same applied to gocover. -- Dmitrij D. Czarkoff