Adam Wolk said:
> Tested on amd64 -current snapshot from May 20. The package is based
> on devel/gocover.

I believe it should be called go-vet, not govet.  The actual tool is
called "vet", and the "go" prefix denotes that it is installed to
subdirectory of ${LOCALBASE}/go instead of ${LOCALBASE}/bin.  As
evidenced in haskell, perl, python and ruby ports, we separate prefixes
with dash.

Same applied to gocover.

-- 
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff

Reply via email to