On 2015/10/14 02:11, Raf Czlonka wrote: > P.S. Should ports-bugs@ be promoted more widely and porters encouraged > to subscribe to it or should it disappear as www@ did a while ago?
The main ports@ list isn't all that high-volume, and ports-bugs is nearly dead (only a couple of messages a year), so I think it probably makes sense to retire ports-bugs. Same for ports-security I think.
