I'm fine with either of them going in though I haven't tested this particular revision. I still believe it is worth waiting a few days after an afl release as there are frequently multiple releases made around the same time.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 03:47:15PM -0300, Gleydson Soares wrote: > similar diff was sent to jsg's review few days ago... > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Michael McConville <mm...@mykolab.com> wrote: > > ok? > > > > > > Index: Makefile > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/afl/Makefile,v > > retrieving revision 1.20 > > diff -u -p -r1.20 Makefile > > --- Makefile 23 Sep 2015 13:30:42 -0000 1.20 > > +++ Makefile 16 Nov 2015 18:36:10 -0000 > > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ > > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 amd64 > > > > COMMENT= instrumented fuzzer > > -DISTNAME= afl-1.94b > > +DISTNAME= afl-1.95b > > EXTRACT_SUFX= .tgz > > CATEGORIES= devel > > > > Index: distinfo > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/afl/distinfo,v > > retrieving revision 1.20 > > diff -u -p -r1.20 distinfo > > --- distinfo 23 Sep 2015 13:30:42 -0000 1.20 > > +++ distinfo 16 Nov 2015 18:36:10 -0000 > > @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ > > -SHA256 (afl-1.94b.tgz) = F1cf8SetEN7GinQzgOyO/d9UHB9RRVXYqMY0qcb3ZrA= > > -SIZE (afl-1.94b.tgz) = 804169 > > +SHA256 (afl-1.95b.tgz) = IexruMGC/YIdJci2coP4GmMsT3RBnJ21/sATXdDJrio= > > +SIZE (afl-1.95b.tgz) = 804542 > > >
