On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 08:56:35PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Tue Feb 02, 2016 at 05:09:34PM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> > What's the point when it requires half of GNOME? You should call the
> > package gvifm...
> 
> Is that my fault!? If you don't like, it don't use it. I'm NOT a vifm
> developer. I only port for my friend Uwe. That's it!

Take a chill pill, dude. I find it hilarious (and a little disgusting) a
ncurses based file manager now depends on gtk.

> 
> > 
> > CONFIGURE_ARGS += --without-gtk --without-libmagic --without-X11 
> > --without-dyn-X11
> 
> That's not my line.

Indeed, that's was my mild suggestion/attempt at decreasing the bloat.
I've tried it like this on sparc64 and it worked fine.

>
> 
> > 
> > (libmagic is a security disaster waiting to happen in a file manager)
> 
> I follow you but it's just a port and not base stuff. I see misc/screen
> in the ports tree. In my opinion screen is creep but it's only my
> personal opinion.
> 
> Finale, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff starts a "no_x11" flavor. Thanks Dmitrij.
> https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/commit/a755a173f7ff05c23ab6d999716a4fe4855a54bc

Good idea, I like it.

> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Rafael

Reply via email to