On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 04:18:16PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > On 2016-03-08, Josh Grosse <j...@jggimi.homeip.net> wrote: > > > Thank you, naddy, for your kind patience with my port update. This one in > > particular has been a learning experience, and I appreciate the guidance. > > That port is awfully complex. I keep wavering between wanting to > split off the Qt client into a separate port to simplify things, > and keeping the port as is just because it makes a good example.
Can you build the qt client separately in a simple enough way to not have lots of patches duplication ? I've had a look, it's not that awful, but then I'm biased, considering what "complex" was in the past...
