On 2016/03/17 23:15, Michael McConville wrote:
> Rationale:
> 
>  o it's been unmodified since import in 2001
>  o there are patches fixing a bunch of obvious dangerous buffer issues
>  o it's an ad-filter proxy, so it's very exposed
> 
> Any objections?

Kill it - privoxy replaces this.

Reply via email to