On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Ingo Feinerer <feine...@logic.at> wrote:
> Update math/R 3.2.3 -> 3.2.4
>
> OK?

Yes, ok with me.

> Best regards,
> Ingo

Ciao!
David

> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/math/R/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.80
> diff -u -p -r1.80 Makefile
> --- Makefile    18 Mar 2016 23:12:18 -0000      1.80
> +++ Makefile    19 Mar 2016 11:18:49 -0000
> @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
>  # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.80 2016/03/18 23:12:18 naddy Exp $
>
>  COMMENT=       powerful math/statistics/graphics language
> -DISTNAME=      R-3.2.3
> -REVISION=      0
> +DISTNAME=      R-3.2.4
>
>  SO_VERSION=    31.2
>  .for _lib in R Rblas Rlapack
> Index: distinfo
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/math/R/distinfo,v
> retrieving revision 1.27
> diff -u -p -r1.27 distinfo
> --- distinfo    14 Dec 2015 16:49:02 -0000      1.27
> +++ distinfo    19 Mar 2016 11:18:49 -0000
> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> -SHA256 (R-3.2.3.tar.gz) = uTt9h4E4J5I0Fg8AfLm3+BuKcsASoVVm6exTlc/ZtsE=
> -SIZE (R-3.2.3.tar.gz) = 29816176
> +SHA256 (R-3.2.4.tar.gz) = uv1AX+nC/ju+R6incwrRIPA7ffn7D2FnT8oZzwYd01A=
> +SIZE (R-3.2.4.tar.gz) = 29879523
> Index: pkg/PLIST
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/math/R/pkg/PLIST,v
> retrieving revision 1.28
> diff -u -p -r1.28 PLIST
> --- pkg/PLIST   28 Sep 2015 07:32:19 -0000      1.28
> +++ pkg/PLIST   19 Mar 2016 11:18:49 -0000
> @@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ lib/R/library/Matrix/Copyrights
>  lib/R/library/Matrix/DESCRIPTION
>  lib/R/library/Matrix/Doxyfile
>  lib/R/library/Matrix/INDEX
> +lib/R/library/Matrix/LICENCE
>  lib/R/library/Matrix/Meta/
>  lib/R/library/Matrix/Meta/Rd.rds
>  lib/R/library/Matrix/Meta/data.rds
>



-- 
"If you try a few times and give up, you'll never get there. But if
you keep at it... There's a lot of problems in the world which can
really be solved by applying two or three times the persistence that
other people will."
                -- Stewart Nelson

Reply via email to