On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 07:44:07PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > Patrik Lundin <pat...@sigterm.se> writes: > > > > > This means that the failing "test" can actually be thought of as a > > feature. It is of course brittle, and will modify the build parameters > > if someone decides to teach the test builtin about "<" prior to bumping > > base gcc past 4.5. > > This is a very unlikely scenario. > > > Basically I am just asking for pointers from other porters, anyone have > > an idea how I should deal with this? Should I bother at all? > > I guess you could just use /bin/test. >
I figured that such a gcc version bump is fairly unlikely but I would rather ask than guess :). Thanks for the input, I'll see what upstream thinks about the "expr" proposal. If they decide to merge it I will return with a patch for the port. -- Patrik Lundin
