On 2016/09/13 21:20, Sander van Kranenburg wrote: > Hi, > > Are you at openbsd 6.0 at the moment? > This is my uname -a OpenBSD openbsd.HOME.local 6.0 GENERIC#0 i386. > -netmask doesn't work at all for me since i updated tot 6.0
-current from a few days ago, but I just also tested it on 6.0 release. > Van: Stuart Henderson [mailto:s...@spacehopper.org] > Verzonden: dinsdag 13 september 2016 23:07 > Aan: Sander van Kranenburg <san...@vkranenburg.nl> > CC: ports@openbsd.org > Onderwerp: Re: openvpn broken caused by a change in route add and delete > > On 2016/09/13 19:29, Sander van Kranenburg wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As far as i know -netmask doesn't work anymore. > > We need to add the netbits tot the network adres like openvpn is doing with > > ipv6. > > -netmask is expected to work exactly the same as specifying ip/prefix, and it > does work fine here: > > # route add -net 192.0.2.0 82.68.199.133 -netmask 255.255.255.0 add net > 192.0.2.0: gateway 82.68.199.133 # netstat -rnfinet | grep ^192 > 192.0.2/24 82.68.199.133 UGS 0 0 - 8 vlan2 > # route delete -net 192.0.2.0 -netmask 255.255.255.0 delete net 192.0.2.0 # > netstat -rnfinet | grep ^192 # > > Exactly the same behaviour as the prefix: > > # route add 192.0.2.0/24 82.68.199.133 > add net 192.0.2.0/24: gateway 82.68.199.133 # netstat -rnfinet | grep ^192 > 192.0.2/24 82.68.199.133 UGS 0 0 - 8 vlan2 > # route delete 192.0.2.0/24 > delete net 192.0.2.0/24 > # netstat -rnfinet | grep ^192 > # > > I think the problem you ran into was something to do with the gateway > address, handling of this *was* changed relatively recently, and not the > syntax of address format to route(8). >
