On 2016/09/24 18:42, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 09:37:45AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2016/09/24 16:35, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > Update coccinelle to 1.0.5, changes described here: > > > http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/distrib/changes.html > > > > I tried updating this at Cambridge (it seemed fitting ;) - my diff is > > nearly the same, only packaging changes - lib/coccinelle/spgen/spgen.opt > > should be in PFRAG.dynlink instead of PLIST - but I dropped it because > > the regression tests didn't look good and I didn't know where to start > > with debugging it. > > Ah, indeed running make test gives: > > -------------------------------- > regression testing information > -------------------------------- > regression file: tests/SCORE_expected.sexp > -------------------------------- > total score > -------------------------------- > good = 218/492 > Current score is lower than expected :( > (was expecting 451 but got 218)
For comparison, the old version gave : good = 452/480 : Current score is greater than expected :) : (was expecting 445 but got 452) If it was just a small difference I'd probably just run with it, but this was a lot bigger than usual.
